| Advice Pool |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Reference and Education > Psychic > Psychics, Psychic Readers & Science! |
|
Advice Pool - Psychics, Psychic Readers & Science!
Much skepticism exists around the subject of psychic phenomena,
and this is probably not a bad thing, given its very checkered
past. Fake mediums, bogus mind readers, magic tricks passed off
as the real thing. The list goes on. Hence, the use of Science should be welcomed in helping to verify some of the psychic community's claims. However, this can also become unhealthy for several reasons, and it is equally important to stand guard against According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product these flaws. They
too are all too common. (1) Biased scientists. The sad truth is that the field of psychic investigation, with only very rare exceptions, fails to excite or attract the very scientific brains. Career-wise, the field of psychic investigation is extremely badly funded, is nearly impossible to make a solid, respected career in, and is the source of endless derision from mainstream scientists and diehard skeptics. Therefore, t ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in here is always gigantic pressure upon
psychic researchers to justify their own existence. At the end of
the day, they have to find something, somewhere! If, from start
to finish, their careers consisted solely of disproving every
single psychic experience that they were presented with, they
would quickly give up the psychic investigation field from
sheer boredom or depression. After all, from a purely personal
standpoint, why bother? Hence, m lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. ost of them are intrinsically
believers to start with. To put it bluntly, the probability is
high that they possess a strong in-built bias in place. This is not to imply that they would fake results. However, we must be aware that, by their very existence in this much maligned field, there is an invisible pressure upon these people to produce something to validate their own existence. Hence, this sort of science is extremely difficult to main here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe tain in a totally
objective manner. Regular academic scientists are always under pressure to justify their funding through their results. How much worse then for scientists who, for the most part, have no funding, and who are often the laughing stock of the scientific community? For all of these reasons, the profession of psychic investigation cannot and will not attract the very finest minds, at least not at the present times. This is not i d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro ntended to be an snub to
scientists involved in the field. It is just reality. The very
best will tend to gravitate towards "safe" fields where their
skill will be recognized, and not derided and scoffed at. It is a pity, but that is just how the world works at present. (2) The inadequacy of Science. The scientific method has served mankind extremely well, but it has its limits. It cannot do everything. Hence, we must be circumspect of tryin ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc g to apply scientific methods
where they may not work well at all. Such is the manner in which
science has been elevated to a religion in our world, this
statement might seem almost absurd. Yet, there are clear occasions where science cannot measure anything. You cannot measure the emotions of love or anger with scientific instruments. Yet, few would doubt that they exist. You cannot use instruments to provide a printout of what somebody is easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi thinking. Yet, nobody would deny that they DO think, and they
very often think in words. You cannot prove scientifically that there are NO toy airplanes in orbit around the planet Venus! It might sound absurd, but no matter how much you search for them and fail to find them, you CANNOT PROVE that they are not there. You can only say that you have not found one YET, and that it is extremely unlikely that they exist. You might be able to say th nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically at with 99.99999999%
certainty. But you can NEVER say it with 100% certainty. Science cannot "prove" a negative. Thus, in the realm of psychic manifestations, science cannot categorically insist that there is no such thing. You CANNOT PROVE that ghosts do not exist, for instance. You can only say that, to date, there has been no conclusive proof that they DO. That is NOT the same as saying that they do NOT. In addition, the scientific method and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ itself has limitations that
psychic manifestations would definitely stretch. In science,
something has to be repeatable for it to have any validity. In
other words, other scientists have to be able to repeat your
process and get exactly the same results. However, this is almost certainly doomed to failure in the psychic realm. Imagine repeating your experiment in a haunted house and DEMANDING that the phantom appear on cue, just because you ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi are performing the same experiment! If, by its very nature, a experience is extremely rare and unpredictable in nature, it is very hard to use Science to say much about it at all. Science has very little to say about rare and unrepeatable events. Yet, these are the very things that life itself is full of. The Scientific Method has little or nothing to say regarding rare or unrepeatable events. Nevertheless, these are the very things that life ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a itself is filled with. It is for this very reason that, initially, the notion that a meteorite collision caused the extinction of the dinosaurs was met with hoots of laughter by the scientific community. It was the very rarity of the event, and the fact that no evidence could be found, that caused laughter to be heaped upon the heads of the theory's proponents. Until, of course, the crater was discovered. We now also know that the role of t dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod he experimenter can
drastically change the results of the experiment. This may
explain why certain famed psychics seem to have their skills
leave them in the cold harsh light of the scientific
laboratory. Yet, only a mediocre investigator would claim that
because this is the case, it proves that there were no psychic
manifestations to begin with! (3) Psychic Skeptics. This may, in part, explain the James Randi effect. This is a psychic inve cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin stigator who is a total skeptic on the subject, and
who approaches the subject with this powerful ingrained bias. He
has issued a challenge to pay a large sum of money to anyone who
can demonstrate psychic powers to him in a scientifically
controlled environment. To date, he still has his money. Now, part of the problem may be that, even if somebody is genuinely psychic, the attitude of the investigator is sufficiently negative to completely tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen extinguish whatever psychic
abilities exist, as long as he is present. Again, a true
investigator of any caliber cannot discount this possibility. This is a purely human factor we are talking about, a function of the human brain, and not a measurement of the boiling point of water. Hence, it is entirely plausible that the negative attitude of the investigator, plus the undue pressure that the psychic is placed under as a result of it, could t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel act to diminish
the very effect being measured. However, the bias of people like Randi and the organization of skeptics that calls itself Psicop, is worrying for another reason. These are people who, while claiming to be scientists, are actually approaching the entire subject with a deep bias that has nothing to do with Science whatsoever. They are skeptical, because they are skeptical. That's all. They are believers in "Disbelief". It's jus ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust t the opposite end of the
spectrum of Belief. That's all. There is no scientific reason for it whatsoever. While they pretend to be scientific, their approach is more akin to a religious dogma; that of treating Science like a religion. It is often called "Scientism" for this reason. They might claim that there is no proof that psychic phenomena exist. Yet, it can be stated with equal validity that there is no proof that they do NOT. That is y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products a totally equivalent
statement. As we have seen earlier, Science cannot PROVE a
negative statement. It can only talk about probabilities and
likelihood. And, as we have discussed, many psychic manifestations
are intrinsically rare or fragile in their very essence. Like any good fanatic, these skeptics like Randi and Psicop have a hidden agenda in "proving" that the world functions the way they think it does. Frankly, a major motivation is FEA . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de R. More
people than would like to admit it are terrified of the
possibility of psychic phenomena. What if someone really COULD
read your mind? Every dirty little secret. What if YOU too could
develop psychic powers? What sort of world would THAT be?! Definitely NOT the comfortable, ultra-conservative, clockwork Newtonian universe these skeptics yearn to inhabit. For them, it's a universe too unendurable to contemplate. Therefore, it simpl elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip y cannot be true! To summarize, we must be very circumspect in being too naive when examining paranormal manifestations, or in rushing to hastily believe claims from the "professional" researchers in this highly controversial field of investigation. However, we have to also be skeptical of the skeptics who, while adopting a "scientific" posture, frequently behave more like unruly ideological evangelicals than even the most mediocre scientist tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Marketing Tools for Success--Getting Back to Basics Non Profit Debt Consolidation Vs For Profit Debt Consolidation: Which Is More Cost-Effective? Flexibility of Small Business Opportunities
|